De cerca, nadie es normal

China: Techno-socialism Seasoned with Artificial Intelligence

Posted: March 18th, 2022 | Author: | Filed under: Artificial Intelligence, Book Summaries, Realpolitik | Tags: , , , | Comments Off on China: Techno-socialism Seasoned with Artificial Intelligence

People take the great ruler for granted and are oblivious to his presence.The good ruler is loved and acclaimed by his subjects. The mediocre ruler is universally feared. The bad ruler is generally despised. Because he lacks credibility, the subjects do not trust him. On the other hand, the great ruler seldom issues orders. Yet he appears to accomplish everything effortlessly. To his subjects everything he does is just a natural occurrence.

Tao-Tê-Ching, Lao-Tsé

Anyone who wants to learn something about China today, to know its strategic plan between now and 2050, the means to achieve it, and what drives this country in this titanic effort, should read the book El gran sueño de China: tecno-socialismo y capitalismo de estado by Claudio F. González.

Claudio F. González, PhD in engineering and economist, has lived in China, as director of Asia for the Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM), for six years. During this time he has been involved in the fields of education, entrepreneurship, research and innovation in the Asian giant. From this privileged vantage point he has been able to observe, analyze, and understand the complexity of this country.

According to the author, throughout the 20th century, the Western world looked at China with the condescension that is due to a former empire in decline and mired in chaos, power struggles, and poverty, and only in the last decades of the past century, as a market of great potential and a cheap manufacturer of limited quality. Nonetheless, China had -and has- its plan, the ultimate goal of which is returning the “Empire of the Center” to the place it has held for most of human history. Namely: being the most socially and technologically advanced nation and, from there, regaining world leadership in the economic, commercial, and cultural spheres.

In 2015, the government announced the first of its grand plans – Made in China 2025, with the goal of making China by this date a leader in industries such as robotics, semiconductor manufacturing, electronic vehicles, renewable energy and, of course, artificial intelligence.

Initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) or institutions such as the Asian Infrastructures Investment Bank (AIIB) are nothing more than instruments through which China wants to reshape an international order that is more favorable to its new interests. One of China’s stated goals is that by 2035 it wants to be the country that globally sets the next standards in areas such as AI, 5G or the Internet of Things.

China’s successes in the digital economy are based on three main factors:

1. A market that is both huge in size and young, which allows for the rapid commercialization of new business models and equally allows for a high level of experimentation.

2. An increasingly rich and varied innovation ecosystem that goes far beyond a few large and famous companies.

3. And a strong government support, which provides favorable economic and regulatory conditions, and also acts as a venture capital investor, a consumer of products based on new technologies and produced by local companies, and allows access to data that are key to developing new solutions in conditions that are unthinkable in other regions.

Professor F. González calls this model techno-socialism or state capitalism.

What are the defining characteristics of this techno-socialist model?

China intends to harness the interest in technological development of its own industry to align it with government interests. The overall goal is, starting from what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) calls a moderately prosperous socialist society, to catch up with and surpass the most developed Western countries, ideally by the 100th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China (2049). Socialism in the sense of the Chinese regime is no longer socialism in the traditional sense of ownership and collective management of the means of production, a political conception definitively defeated after Mao’s demise; but its control and coordination to achieve social objectives.

The features that characterize this techno-socialism are those of complete physical security for people and things, the absence of extreme poverty, full employment, and the possibility for the most industrious to obtain economic and prestige rewards for their efforts, as long as they are aligned with the objectives established by the party and do not put its dominion at the least risk. This techno-socialism tries to lead society as a whole towards a centrality of thought that avoids extremisms that destroy peace and social security, and that do not call into question the leadership and omnipotent dominance of the party.

The alignment between business interests -or those of other institutions- and public interests, as interpreted by the party, creates a unique innovation ecosystem in which companies capable of promoting solutions for a broad user base become champions of an industrial policy. Once this status is achieved, and always within the logic of interest alignment, they will gain access to a whole arsenal of measures -subsidies, tax reductions, preferential treatment-, to maintain this position and, if possible, extend it internationally, since they are no longer merely companies, but ambassadors of a new model. In the particular case of artificial intelligence, the government has contributed with the necessary conditions -strategies, plans, regulation, space for experimentations- and practical support -venture capital, public procurement, permissions to access data-, for innovations in this field to follow. Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu set up research centers, deploy applications, enroll human capital, and support CCP policies.

Will techno-socialism be able to generate enough disruptive innovations to give the technology created in China an entity of its own?

Between 2015 and 2018, the venture capital funded more than €1 trillion to new technology start-ups in China. China has more unicorns -companies less than ten years old with a valuation above $1 billion- than any other country. In terms of research, China is already the country with the most scientific articles, surpassing the US, although it is true that its impact is still minor, the gap is rapidly closing. It turns out that it has been the state the one which, with its research grants, scholarships and universities, has generated ideas that, because of their risk, private initiative would never have dared to finance. Hence, in this sense, public authorities that nurture alternative ways of thinking are the true engine of progress.

Professor F. González names this innovation paradigm applicable to China as asymmetric triple helix model, in which the national government controls the overall innovation context through its top- down policies and plans but, at the same time, allows a certain level of autonomy for district, local and regional governments to conduct their own experiments and accommodate innovations that emerge from the bottom up. Large companies, start-ups, and finance companies are aligned with government interests. And universities and research centers similarly align themselves with government objectives in producing new knowledge and generating talent in the form of human capital.

And eventually, when will China achieve and assume the role of world leader?

From the author’s standpoint China, due to a set of inconsistencies and structural gaps, is neither ready nor willing to assume the global leadership in the foreseeable future. However, it does claim to be the most powerful and influential economy, with the most cohesive society and the least contested domestic leadership that will enable it to become something like the best country in a fragmented world. China’s current strength lies in the existence of a long-term plan: a sense of destiny that ties in with its imperial past. There is a deep conviction in Chinese society, a determination, which is the key force to achieve these strategic objectives.

China does not want to be a powerful nation, but deserves it.


Felipe de Neve, primer gobernador de California y fundador de la ciudad de Los Ángeles

Posted: May 12th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: History | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Felipe de Neve, primer gobernador de California y fundador de la ciudad de Los Ángeles

En 1774 Felipe de Neve, oriundo de Bailén, un pequeña población andaluza en la provincia de Jaén, es nombrado Gobernador de las Californias, la primera persona que ostentó el título completo y que estuvo directamente al cargo de la administración de la nueva zona norte. Siete años después, el 4 de septiembre de 1781, Felipe de Neve funda el asentamiento de El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles del Río de Porciúncula, más tarde conocido simplemente como la ciudad de Los Ángeles.

Leer más »


Felipe de Neve, First Governor of California and Founder of the City of Los Ángeles

Posted: March 25th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: History | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Felipe de Neve, First Governor of California and Founder of the City of Los Ángeles

In 1774 Felipe de Neve, a native of Bailén -a little Andalusian town in Spain- was named Governor of the Californias, the first person with the full title to be directly charged with the administration of the new northern area. Seven years later -September 4th, 1781- Felipe de Neve founded the city of El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles del Río de Porciúncula, later known as simply Los Ángeles.

Leer más »


The Energy World Is Flat: Opportunities from the End of Peak Oil by Daniel Lacalle

Posted: February 9th, 2015 | Author: | Filed under: Realpolitik | Tags: , , , , , , , | 1 Comentario »

Approximately for the past three years I have been following what Daniel Lacalle has been publishing in the digital newspaper elconfidencial.com, and I must admit the information he has been sharing and his opinions have been, from my humble standpoint, ones of the most accurate that I have ever read regarding the energy industry.

Therefore, when I was presented with this book The Energy World Is Flat: Opportunities from the End of the Peak Oil, I presumed I was going to learn a good bunch of new ideas about the current global energy scenario; and I was not mistaken.

The Energy World is Flat

Leer más »


Snowden, sin un lugar donde esconderse

Posted: July 9th, 2014 | Author: | Filed under: Realpolitik | Tags: , | 2 Comentarios »

Y yo que pensaba que los malos de la película eran siempre los rusos… Pues hete aquí que mi amigo Juan F. Calero me invita a la presentación en España del libro Snowden, sin un lugar donde esconderse de Glenn Greenwald, el periodista de The Guardian que ayudó a Edward Snowden a sacar a la luz la información relativa a la NSA, y claro, uno que tiene curiosidad, empieza a leerlo y, conforme avanzo en mi lectura, la sorpresa va en aumento y comienzo a hacerme una ligera idea del tinglado de interceptación y robo de telecomunicaciones que tiene montado el amigo Obama, sí, el mismo que viste y calza, el premio Nobel de la Paz de 2009.

Snowden, sin un lugar donde esconderse

Leer más »